While Myers has some good point, particularly the need for the church to cultivate relational environments rather than to create artificial relationships through programs, I think the table below demonstrates the difference between my point of view and his. He sites the work of Bullard and seem to think that the "Community" is the goal of the church. (I'd actually argue that it is the goal of current culture.) I think that Family is the relational goal of the church. I added to Myer's summary of Bullard in thoughts in the last column and the last three.
Relational perspectives from 4 different church models*
Committees | Teams | Communities | Family Communities | |
Formation | Elected or appointed according to rules | Recruited or drafted to work on specific project | Voluntarily connected in search of genuine and meaningful experiences | Voluntary commitment, often unspoken, based on common experiences and a need for one another |
Focus | Making decision or setting policies | Maturing to performing tasks more effectively | Add qualitative relationship, meaning, and experiences to the organization, organisms or movement | Move to meet the best of all—individually and as a unit |
Membership | Fixed term | Serve for life of project | No bounded membership and members come and go as interest dictates | Members are received with both family and individual accept adoption; Membership loss is mourned |
Outside Assistance | High quality training and consultants | Partner with respected practitioners or coaches | Align with advocates who come alongside | Relate to outsiders as extended family |
Recruitment | People of respect | People of expertise | People of passion | People of mutual love |
Benefits | Build loyalty to mission | Create effect action | Provide enthusiasm | Create an environment of unconditional love |
Style of Work | Making lasting decisions and manage resources | Debate strengths and weaknesses to develop the best product | Dialog to arrive at the best solution | Seek wisdom with reliance on patri/matriarchs to ensure the most loving decision for all |
Sharing | Share mission but seldom power | Share love both inwardly and outwardly | ||
Reproduction | Look to created purpose for subcommittees or department | No real reason unless a new project comes long | Based on an individual or segment of the membership discovering an following a new passion together | When younger members mature an begin a family of their own |
The Lost | At worst: a thread to the organization At best: another project for another committee | At worst: Something that slows productivity At best: A hill to conquer together | At worst: A distraction for the communities goals At best: The passion | At worst: A threat to the family At best: Objects for expanding the circle of love |
* Adapted and expanded from George Bullard’s “Abandon Committees, Skip Teams and Embrace Communities” as summarized in The Search to Belong by Joseph R. Myers, pg. 14-15. (The shaded area represents Bullard’s work.)